Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Michael Domitrz <>
- To: Angela DiNunzio Seguin <>, , "Kile, Marilyn J" <>
- Subject: Re: Drunk driving analogy
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 15:25:21 -0500
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
I agree with Marilyn's comments overall. I just want to make sure everyone on the ListServe is thinking about the RESPONSE of the students when you take an approach.
In most states, you canNOT give consent if you are drunk. Legally, two people engaging in "drunk sex" is a sexual assault. You are correct that many, many juries and judicial boards ignore this portion of the law in sexual assault cases. They often BLAME THE WOMAN EVEN MORE for being drunk than they blame the partner for "Taking Advantage" of her (even when they know the partner was much more sober than the drunk woman who was taken advantage of). That is one the reasons the drunk driving analogy is very dangerous to use.
The only way I believe in using the drunk driving analogy is in BYSTANDER INTERVENTION. You see 2 drunks friends about to get in a car and drive home. Do you intervene? Almost every student says, "OF COURSE!" You see 2 drunk friends about to leave to have sex at one of their apartments, do you intervene? Now the same students says, "OF COURSE NOT." Why not? "Because that is none of my business." Why was it your business if they choose to drunk drive? "Because someone could get killed or hurt?" Is there a strong risk that 2 drunk people hooking-up could be in danger -- sti, stds, pregnancy, and/or sexual assault? Yea, but . . . The only difference is that you THINK about the consequences of friends drunk driving because you've been taught that lesson since elementary school. You have not been taught to see the consequences of drunk hook-ups. See the consequences to your friends being in danger BEFORE it happens.
I agree with you that there is no "MAGICAL SENTENCE" to say to students to get these points across. For this very reason, we have to be careful and deliberate with how we promote these conversations. We need to be engaging students in detail to address all their obstacles and objections to fully understanding the issue.
Mike Domitrz, CSP
The Date Safe Project
"Teaching Boundaries, Respect, & Sexual Assault Awareness for Teenagers & Young Adults."
==============================
Get insightful articles and ideas in our
weekly newsletter at:
http://www.datesafeproject.org
SIGN-UP TODAY
==============================
Toll-Free: 800-329-9390
E-mail:
Website: http://www.datesafeproject.org
- Drunk driving analogy, Michelle N. Issadore, 05/21/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, alicevachss, 05/21/2008
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, Juliette Grimmett, 05/21/2008
- Residence Halls: environmental set up and chances for bystander intervention, Adriane Bang, 05/22/2008
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, Juliette Grimmett, 05/21/2008
- Drunk driving analogy, Gillian Greensite, 05/22/2008
- RE: Drunk driving analogy, Kile, Marilyn J, 05/22/2008
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, Michael Domitrz, 05/22/2008
- RE: Drunk driving analogy, HARRINRL, 05/22/2008
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, Angela DiNunzio Seguin, 05/22/2008
- Drunk Driving analogy, Claire Kaplan, 05/22/2008
- Re: Drunk driving analogy, Michael Domitrz, 05/22/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.