Scholarly discussion of the music of John Cage.

[Herb Levy <>]

Here's Andrew Culver's list of software he developed for John Cage: Culver - John Cage Computer Programs

It's my understanding that most of these programs are not available. I don't know if Andrew Culver is on this list, but from this web page you should be able find your way to a link from which you may be able to ask him questions.

Culver - John Cage Computer Programs Anarchic Harmony: John Cage Computer Programs

On Sunday, January 13, 2019, 9:41:15 PM CST, David Bellows <> wrote:

Hello all,

I'm finishing up a mesostic generating program that I'm using for a

larger project. While researching for it, I came across a number of

claims about how Cage generated them.

I get that the process evolved over time. But what I'm most interested

is in the software he used to generate mesostics.

If I'm reading everything correctly, it looks like Jim Rosenberg wrote

the program MESOLIST for this purpose. I am having a difficult time

finding details about the program and hoping some people here can

help.

1. Is it available anywhere for downloading or studying?

2. Did the program generate the wing words?

3. Did the program follow only the 100% rule or allow for the 50% rule also?

4. I've read that Cage chose to leave out some wing words. Is this

true for how he used the program or was that just something he did on

the mesostics he generated by hand?

5. Right now my program chooses up to seven words on either side of

the spine word following the 100% rule for all the words. Next I will

have it limit the number of words randomly but they will still be in

order (ie, anywhere from 0 to 7 of the preceding/following words). A

mesostic generator I see online

(http://vyh.pythonanywhere.com/psmeso/) chooses randomly from all the

words between spine words following the 100% rule. My approach will

generate fragments that make sense since it can potentially string up

to 15 words in a row from the source text while the online one won't

do so. Which approach more closely matches Rosenberg's program?

I'm really a terrible programmer (I'm a composer and not a

programmer), so the fact that I've gotten this much working probably

means I won't change how it works on a fundamental level but I would

like to have an idea about how closely my approach matches the

software Cage used.

Thanks everyone,

Dave Bellows