Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

silence - [silence] Re: Aleatoric • Indeterminacy • C hance

Subject: Scholarly discussion of the music of John Cage.

List archive

[silence] Re: Aleatoric • Indeterminacy • C hance


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ben Judson <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [silence] Re: Aleatoric • Indeterminacy • C hance
  • Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:35:37 -0600

When I read this passage, it seems to me that Cage is using the three terms interchangeably, while criticizing the way Boulez understands them or how he uses the techniques. Perhaps he is simply critiquing Boulez for not distinguishing appropriately between the three terms?

On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Ed Crooks wrote:

Hi Rod,

I certainly side with you on this one!

On the question of the term "aleatory", there is this from For the Birds, pp.180-1 Cage: "In fact, Boulez in turn threw himself into chance operations. But for him, chance served as a pretext for inventing the term ‘aleatory.’ I believe he established its present musical definition. Well, he used that word only to describe appropriate and correct chance operations, as opposed to those which seemed to him inappropriate or incorrect – mine! In fact, his chance operations fit into his compositions only as part of a drama. He very strictly distinguishes between determinate passages and ‘aleatory’ passages in the same composition. As a whole, it becomes a drama between opposites: determinate vs. indeterminate.”

best,
Ed
 



From: Rod Stasick <>
To: Silence <>
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013, 14:26
Subject: [silence] Aleatoric • Indeterminacy • Chance

Hello Silencers,

Hope everyone is staying warm and not having
to deal with too much snow and cold.

I wanted to mention that I'm having an interesting...
ummmm...discussion with a guy online who has some 
misguided ideas about Cage's ideas and work:

Ideas like:

• Cage was known for his use of "mathematical equations
to create his music..." and then sites Joan's book "Musicage..."
as proof and tells me I need to read that... 
(Yeah, and Ravi Shankar was known for his dancing.)

• "Cage 'invented' aleatoric music" 
then when challenged says that he was the first to do so on record...
(out of curiosity, I wanted to check online which recording,
with year, was the first one released of John's music, but couldn't 
find André's list {the site is down} and couldn't figure out how to
find this bit of information using the "Complete Works" page
at johncage.org. I must be aging faster than I realize - ha!
Does anyone know what the first release actually was?

but anyway,

as a result of this, I'm discovering a kind of blurring
of the definitions of these three ideas:

• Aleatoric music
• Indeterminacy
• Chance

What I've long thought of as separate ideas
seems to be often thrown together (just recently?) 
as all the same - all three supposedly having the same meaning
which, to me, has clearly never been the case.
I know that John disliked the term "aleatoric"
but my aging mind needs refreshing as to where I've actually read this.
Yes, there's Meyer-Eppler's Darmstadt introduction
of the process...and Boulez took to popularizing it,
but it would be nice to visit's John's words.

Anyway, I'm wondering if any of you have your own
comments about these three ideas and their interrelation.

thanks,

Rod






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page