Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "S. Daniel Carter" <>
- To: Jessie Mindlin <>, Juliette Grimmett <>, <>, <>, <>
- Subject: Re: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:02:03 -0400
While referenced in OCR’s Title IX Dear Colleague Letter from earlier this year, as the provision in question is actually a requirement of the Jeanne Clery Act I would also suggest referencing the U.S. Department of Education’s 2011 Clery handbook and the 2009 version of the FERPA regulations which are the first to formally reflect this determination (although the underlying requirement actually dates back to 1992 the Georgetown case in 2004 was the first where it was applied in this context). Specifically, page 144 of The Handbook for Campus Safety and Security Reporting states that “This is an unconditional disclosure; a victim cannot be required to sign a nondisclosure agreement or to otherwise agree to a prohibition from discussing the case. Notification of the final results to both the victim and the accused should be made in the same manner and the same time frame.” The handbook is available online at http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/handbook-2.pdf. The current FERPA regulations, at 34 CFR ยง 99.33(c), provide that FERPA’s re-disclosure prohibition “does not apply…to information that postsecondary institutions are required to disclose under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, 20 U.S.C. 1092(f) (Clery Act), to the accuser and accused regarding the outcome of any campus disciplinary proceeding brought alleging a sexual offense.” The Family Policy Compliance Office, which enforces FERPA, makes a copy of these regulations available at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/pdf/ferparegs.pdf. If you need any further information or clarification please don’t hesitate to let us know. -- S. Daniel Carter Director of Public Policy Security On Campus, Inc. 110 Gallagher Road Wayne, PA 19087 Office: (484) 580-8754 E-Mail: From: Jessie Mindlin <> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:59:39 -0400 To: Juliette Grimmett <>, <>, <>, <> Subject: RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing Juliette – I’m guessing you’re
referring to the OCR decision in the Georgetown/Dieringer case. The OCR letter
is attached - see item 2) on page 2. This issue is also referenced
in the April 2011 Dear Colleague Letter (see page 13), which is also attached. The
relevant excerpt is below: (D) Notice of Outcome Both parties must be
notified, in writing, about the outcome of both the complaint and any appeal,31
i.e., whether harassment was
found to have occurred. OCR recommends that schools provide the written
determination of the final outcome to the complainant and the alleged
perpetrator concurrently. Title IX does not require the school to notify the
alleged perpetrator of the outcome before it notifies the complainant. Due to the intersection of Title IX and FERPA requirements, OCR
recognizes that there may be confusion regarding what information a school may
disclose to the complainant.32 FERPA generally prohibits the nonconsensual
disclosure of personally identifiable information from a student’s
“education record.” However, as stated in the 2001 Guidance, FERPA permits a school to
disclose to the harassed student information about the sanction imposed upon a
student who was found to have engaged in harassment when the sanction directly
relates to the harassed student. This includes an order that the harasser stay
away from the harassed student, or that the harasser is prohibited from
attending school for a period of time, or transferred to other classes or
another residence hall.33 Disclosure of other information in the
student’s “education record,” including information aboutsanctions that do not relate to the harassed student, may result in a violation
of FERPA. Feel free to let me know if you need
additional information or resources. - Jessie From: Juliette
Grimmett [] Hello all - I know that
several years ago there was a change made federally that made it allowable for
the survivor in a campus sexual misconduct hearing to be able to share the
outcome. Does anyone have that documented somewhere so that I can share
it with our Student Conduct folks? Thank you Juliette Grimmett Office for
Institutional Equity & Diversity 3120 f: 919-515-1066 Are you a student who needs support for yourself or a loved oneregarding sexual and relationship violence including stalking? The
Women's Center is now able to offer NCSU students confidential support services
Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. P Consider
the environment before printing this email or the attachment. |
- confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Juliette Grimmett, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Heather Horton, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Jessie Mindlin, 10/25/2011
- Re: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, S. Daniel Carter, 10/25/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.