Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Jessie Mindlin" <>
- To: "Juliette Grimmett" <>, <>, <>, <>
- Subject: RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:59:39 -0400
|
Juliette – I’m guessing you’re
referring to the OCR decision in the Georgetown/Dieringer case. The OCR letter
is attached - see item 2) on page 2. This issue is also referenced
in the April 2011 Dear Colleague Letter (see page 13), which is also attached. The
relevant excerpt is below: (D) Notice of Outcome Both parties must be
notified, in writing, about the outcome of both the complaint and any appeal,31
i.e., whether harassment was
found to have occurred. OCR recommends that schools provide the written
determination of the final outcome to the complainant and the alleged
perpetrator concurrently. Title IX does not require the school to notify the
alleged perpetrator of the outcome before it notifies the complainant. Due to the intersection of Title IX and FERPA requirements, OCR
recognizes that there may be confusion regarding what information a school may
disclose to the complainant.32 FERPA generally prohibits the nonconsensual
disclosure of personally identifiable information from a student’s
“education record.” However, as stated in the 2001 Guidance, FERPA permits a school to
disclose to the harassed student information about the sanction imposed upon a
student who was found to have engaged in harassment when the sanction directly
relates to the harassed student. This includes an order that the harasser stay
away from the harassed student, or that the harasser is prohibited from
attending school for a period of time, or transferred to other classes or
another residence hall.33 Disclosure of other information in the
student’s “education record,” including information about
sanctions that do not relate to the harassed student, may result in a violation
of FERPA. Feel free to let me know if you need
additional information or resources. - Jessie From: Juliette
Grimmett [mailto:] Hello all - I know that
several years ago there was a change made federally that made it allowable for
the survivor in a campus sexual misconduct hearing to be able to share the
outcome. Does anyone have that documented somewhere so that I can share
it with our Student Conduct folks? Thank you Juliette Grimmett Office for
Institutional Equity & Diversity 3120 f: 919-515-1066 Are you a student who needs support for yourself or a loved one
regarding sexual and relationship violence including stalking? The
Women's Center is now able to offer NCSU students confidential support services
Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. P Consider
the environment before printing this email or the attachment. |
Attachment:
Georgetown U Dept of Ed Final Decision on Dieringer Clery case.pdf
Description: Georgetown U Dept of Ed Final Decision on Dieringer Clery case.pdf
Attachment:
Dear Colleague Letter April 4 2011.pdf
Description: Dear Colleague Letter April 4 2011.pdf
- confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Juliette Grimmett, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Heather Horton, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Jessie Mindlin, 10/25/2011
- Re: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, S. Daniel Carter, 10/25/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.