Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Heather Horton <>
- To: Juliette Grimmett <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:45:29 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
|
Juliette—The Center for Public Integrity’s report, which you can find here:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/campus_assault/articles/entry/1838 lays out the history of non-disclosure requirement cases against schools. The report states:
“In November 2008, however, the Education Department determined the school had violated the Clery
Act. In
a letter to UVA President John Casteen, it stated “the University cannot require an accuser to agree to abide by its non-disclosure policy, in writing or otherwise.” The November 3, 2008 letter added: It is … clear that several UVA students were persuaded that failure to adhere to the confidentiality
policy could have resulted in serious consequences ranging from disciplinary action to not being granted a hearing before the Sexual Assault Board in the first place. The department’s UVA decision has made it clear that alleged student victims are no longer required
to keep quiet about their hearing results. This year, in fact, the Education Department has amended its FERPA regulations to specify as much. The new regulations have thus effectively ended confidentiality requirements for hearing
results on college campuses. But they have left open questions about broader secrecy requirements to
participate in the college judicial process — even on the UVA campus.” Also, the Title IX Dear Colleague letter stipulates that “Additionally, a postsecondary institution may disclose to anyone—not just the alleged victim—the final
results of a disciplinary proceeding if it determines that the student is an alleged perpetrator of a crime of violence or a non-forcible sex offense, and, with respect to the allegation made, the student has committed a violation of the institution’s rules
or policies.36” Hope that helps! --Heather Heather L. Horton, Ph.D. Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Psychologist Colorado College (719) 227-8101 http://blog.coloradocollege.edu/SARP//welcome/
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL TRANSMISSION This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information which may be confidential and legally
privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this electronic transmission was sent. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents
of the information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please call (719) 227-8101 and delete the message. THANK YOU. From: Juliette Grimmett [mailto:]
Hello all - I know that several years ago there was a change made federally that made it allowable for the survivor in a campus sexual misconduct
hearing to be able to share the outcome. Does anyone have that documented somewhere so that I can share it with our Student Conduct folks? Thank you Juliette Grimmett Office for Institutional Equity & Diversity 3120 Talley Student Center f: 919-515-1066 Are you a student who needs support for yourself or a loved one regarding sexual and relationship violence including stalking?
The Women's Center is now able to offer NCSU students confidential support services Monday-Friday 9am-5pm.
P
Consider the environment before printing this email or the attachment.
|
- confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Juliette Grimmett, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Heather Horton, 10/25/2011
- RE: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, Jessie Mindlin, 10/25/2011
- Re: confidentiality re: survivor in SM hearing, S. Daniel Carter, 10/25/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.