Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Wantland, Ross A" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: RE: online sexual assault program
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:57:46 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
Though I guess at the same time it's about defining the act as rape - both
for survivors and perpetrators (who both vastly underreport experiences that
meet the legal definition of rape as rape). In my work with men, we do have
to help them know what it is that they've done or what it looks like, because
many of them don't name their actions as sexually violent until that moment.
I think that deep down inside, they know something was not okay about what
they did, but they don't name it rape.
Especially in a society that encourages a sexually violent hegemonic
sexuality (for men to enact and for women to accept/receive), we have to be
vigilant to help everyone understand and recognize sexual violence when it
happens.
Thanks for a great discussion!
Ross
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Juliette Grimmett
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:40 AM
To:
;
Sean Chavez; Sarah Holdwick
Subject: RE: online sexual assault program
yes yes yes - the piece about sexual violence being an act that perps don't
realize they are doing makes me crazy - that is why I don't like the Sex
Signals program. This should not at all be about telling them that this is
what it is, so now they won't do it! The men's part should be about being an
empowered bystander and teaching them skills in which to do this. I have
talked to nformd about this and in fact they have taken some of my bystander
activities and are considering ways to include that with the program. The
verbal judo stuff is funky to me as well. Even in a best case scenario in
which somehow she does get away from him, once again the responsibility is
put on the survivor AND this is not primary prevention - he will go find
someone else to rape - does not address any cultural change at all - to me it
is exactly like the self-defense approach, which I do not agree with.
this is a great discussion, thank you to all...
"It's so liberating and important for men to understand that they can
actually be friendly to women instead of playing some gender-specific role,
and that women are in most ways the same as they are. I think that lots of
women already know that, but not so many guys do." -my dad
8/3/07
Juliette Grimmett, MPH
Rape Prevention Education Coordinator
NC State University
Women's Center
3120 Talley Student Center
Campus BOX 7306
Raleigh, NC 27695-7306
Office: (919) 513-3232
24 Hour Sexual Violence Hotline: (919)618-RAPE (7273)
Fax: (919) 515-1066
email:
website: http://www.ncsu.edu/womens_center
>>> "Sarah Holdwick"
>>> <>
>>> 12/12/2007
10:33 AM >>>
As Juliette mentioned, there is no one program that will perfectly address
every aspect of SA in a way that will reach everyone. There is a lot of
useful information included in the nformd program, but I agree with Sean
about the "Verbal Judo" section. It sends a lot of mixed messages and
ultimately holds women responsible for preventing the assault. I also
question the soundness of telling women to "crap your pants" because "you
will be less attractive to him" as a realistic defense tactic against sexual
assault. Are they kidding? For one, I do not know of too many women who,
given the context of acquaintance or intimate partner sexual assault, would
consider that a reasonable option. Secondly, SA has nothing to do with
attractiveness. Lastly, I flat out laughed when the female student stated
she had HIV and the male student responded with "so do I." I get the point-
say whatever you think will work and get the hell out of there- but think the
method in which this message was relayed is somewhat crude, irresponsible,
and even mocking.
Underneath the dialogue is the idea that many (most?) men who commit sexual
assault in the college context do not know they are perpetrators and that
they do it by accident. While I think the program does a fairly decent job
of explaining certain rape myths, I am very uncomfortable with this idea
partly because it provides a loophole for assailants to avoid responsibility
for their actions and also because it minimizes the impact of sexual assault
on the victim as 'he didn't really mean it.' This is something that has
previously come up on the listserv, so I digress, but this reminds me of a
journal article written by Beth Quinn and published in Gender and Society
(www.gas.sagepub.com) entitled "Sexual Harassment and Masculinity: The Power
and Meaning of 'Girl Watching.'" The article suggests that masculinity must
constantly be proven and performed, often at the expense of women through
activities such as sexual harassment. Men either directly or indirectly
understand the objectifying nature of sexual harassment but essentially
choose to refuse to empathize with the hurt a woman may feel because of
harassment they perpetrate. The issue is not that men don't get it but that
most CHOOSE not to get it for fear of identifying with women's life
experiences.
Thoughts?
Sarah Holdwick
Sexual Assault Advocate & Prevention Educator Underground Railroad, Inc.
(989) 755-0413 ext. 223
This message, including all attachments, is privileged and may contain
confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above.
Any other distribution, copying, storage or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify sender
immediately and permanently delete the original transmission.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Sean Chavez
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Linder, Chris;
Subject: RE: online sexual assault program
I also have a concern about the "Verbal Judo" and the goal of this is to
"escape" out of a situation without any "form of physical or verbal
resistance." Being from a resistance based state I don't feel that is the
best advice to give women.
Any thoughts?
Sean Chavez
Program Specialist
Violence Prevention Programs
University of Idaho
208-885-2095
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Linder,Chris
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:30 AM
To: Juliette Grimmett; Katherine G Rose-Mockry;
;
Candace Daniels
Subject: RE: online sexual assault program
Hi All,
I have some significant concerns around the material included in this online
sexual assault program. While I recognize that it clearly works for some
campuses with limited staff and resources, I think it is important to
recognize that this program is at best heterosexist and at worst homophobic.
The use of male on male rape to evoke empathy in college men has been
controversial for some time, and this program uses that perspective. I think
the homophobic message inherent in this type of "empathy" causes far more
damage than good. In addition, the video perpetuates many essentializing
messages around gender that further alienates transgender and gender-queer
students. We have done a disservice to the GLB and Transgender community for
far too long and I think that the use of heterosexist material continues
this. I'm not sure how to counter this when doing these kinds of generic
programs that might be better than not doing anything, but I think it needs
to at least be acknowledg ed.
In addition to the lack of messages around GLB and T issues, it also does not
address other marginalized populations - issues around sexual assault are
different in communities of color and the disabled community than they are in
the dominant culture, and this program does not address these factors either.
It is also expensive. If someone would give our office $6 for every incoming
student to our campus, we could do a lot to reach incoming students in
various ways - potentially multiple programs in 1st year classes.
Just some more food for thought...
Chris
Chris Linder
Director, Women's Programs & Studies
112 Student Services
Fort Collins, CO 80523-8200
Phone: (970) 491-6384
Fax: (970) 491-4922
wps.colostate.edu
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Juliette Grimmett
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:48 AM
To: Katherine G Rose-Mockry;
;
Candace Daniels
Subject: RE: online sexual assault program
Hi Kathy and everyone else-
your concerns are all very valid. Ultimately, just like with any program,
there is no perfect way to do this. My thoughts are that this program is a
great way to get something out to all of your students as long as you ALSO
continue to do programming all over campus to show that there is a person
behind this AND that they know there is someone they can speak with. By
itself with no follow-up, not a great idea.
I definitely heard that some of our students multi-tasked during the program
and that can't be helped. Even in a classroom, who knows which students are
doing something else...what can be an advantage to this program is that for
students that are very uncomfortable in groups or for those that may be
triggered, this type of module allows students to do it on their own time, in
phases, and in a place that they feel safe.
I looked at this program as being able to do SOMETHING that I can't.
I
alone cannot go and provide a baseline program for all 5000+ first-year
students. Some of them I will be able to reach in a classroom, RA training,
housing workshop, etc., but it is not guaranteed. This at least ensures the
opportunity of reaching them all, and provides some baseline if I get to meet
with them in person. From the data we have been collecting, most students
incoming students (upwards of 90%) have not received any SV programming
before coming to campus, so this is better than nothing.
Also, while modules with acting can have a cheese factor, they are a million
times better than the SexualAssault EDU program and have some diversity in
their members. I haven't gone through all of our evaluations/data, but
overall it seems that at least our students did not find it too cheesy, but
it is definitely a great idea to ask your students what they think.
Also, the price is what they call "the price of a movie ticket per person."
So, somewhere around $7/8 per student is my guess. You may be able to work
out a figure that works for both of you if you decide to go ahead with the
program.
All this said, it is a huge cost and something that I believe the
University/College itself should pay for - not the Women's Centers and IPV
centers. Many are paying for the Alcohol EDU program, we need to get them on
board with this as well.
juliette
"It's so liberating and important for men to understand that they can
actually be friendly to women instead of playing some gender-specific role,
and that women are in most ways the same as they are. I think that lots of
women already know that, but not so many guys do." -my dad
8/3/07
Juliette Grimmett, MPH
Rape Prevention Education Coordinator
NC State University
Women's Center
3120 Talley Student Center
Campus BOX 7306
Raleigh, NC 27695-7306
Office: (919) 513-3232
24 Hour Sexual Violence Hotline: (919)618-RAPE (7273)
Fax: (919) 515-1066
email:
website: http://www.ncsu.edu/womens_center
>>> "Rose-Mockry, Katherine G"
>>> <>
>>> 12/11/2007 11:26
AM
>>>
Hi Candace and group members,
I received this information as well and visited the site to view the program.
From my perspective, it is a good idea but has some inherent
problems:
1. Students can multi-task (or simply not attend to it) while watching.
The video producers have included a pre and post test to make it less likely
students will stop watching it altogether, but I think smart students know
how to answer these with limited involvement.
2. It is easier to not connect emotionally when watching a video than in a
presentation. I've always felt that one of our most important tasks is
connecting with students on an emotional level, which is where the real
change comes about.
3. The student actors come off as too "scripted" and the dialogue seems a
bit insincere for me - students may not see it the way I do though.
I am going to get some of our students to take a look at it and give me
feedback - would like to know what those of you who have used it think about
it. I also notice it's hard to get specific info about the cost of this
program.
Kathy
Kathy Rose-Mockry
Program Director, Emily Taylor Women's Resource Center University of Kansas
(785) 864-3552
www.etwrc.ku.edu
The Student Involvement and Leadership Center exists because involvement
enhances learning
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Daniels, Candace
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:00 AM
To:
Subject: online sexual assault program
Hello all -
I just received a brochure in the mail about an online sexual assault
prevention program called nformd.net (http://nformd.net <http://nformd.net/>
). I have never heard of it before today, and wanted to know if anyone has
any experience with it. If you have used it, how was it received on your
campus? Do the students actually visit the site?
Thanks!!
Candace Daniels
Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Coordinator
St. Mary's College of Maryland
TEL: 240.895.4289
E-mail is not a secure form of communication. The confidentiality of this
e-mail cannot be guaranteed.
Be empowered...
.....to STOP sexual violence...
.....to ACT as an intervening bystander...
.....to STAND as a man against sexual violence...
.....BE EMPOWERED.
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
- online sexual assault program, Daniels, Candace, 12/11/2007
- Re: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Rose-Mockry, Katherine G, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Linder,Chris, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Sean Chavez, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Rose-Mockry, Katherine G, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Sarah Holdwick, 12/12/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/12/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Wantland, Ross A, 12/12/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/12/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Sean Chavez, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Linder,Chris, 12/11/2007
- RE: online sexual assault program, Juliette Grimmett, 12/11/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.