Subject: Scholarly discussion of the music of John Cage.
List archive
- From: Stefano Pocci <>
- To: Jeremy Millar <>
- Cc: Silence <>
- Subject: [silence] Re: Every Day is a Good Day
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:26:45 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=o+cvhb1+3zRoieQaSQhDm0uweTzdcjGFW4tpUzEYueCTUQZlW39ntPZfmXtRLpsP/g A64HaVAzwn81yGUb1FbCJ7mlYOa7/BqkPZAdEYR49TbKM5bGtByz+PUsHrVoF8dukxs/ hrTTWkUVvauZ09n/wDRSW3m35RDAx6Ge2S0A0=
On 07/02/2010 02:42 AM, Jeremy Millar wrote:
Dear all, That's weird... or maybe not. I remember someone saying that even if Cage used random generators (be it the I-Ching book or the equivalent software) what did actually turn out in the end was very Cage-like, as if chance was seconding Cage strange taste (if he had one:-) So you shouldn't be surprised by the result you obtained. I guess chance will always work fine with anything by Cage. -- Stefano "Poor tools require better skills" - Marcel Duchamp |
- [silence] Every Day is a Good Day, Jeremy Millar, 07/01/2010
- [silence] Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Stefano Pocci, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Jeremy Millar, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Re: Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Rod Stasick, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Re: Re: Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Jeremy Millar, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Re: Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Rod Stasick, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Jeremy Millar, 07/02/2010
- [silence] Re: Every Day is a Good Day, Stefano Pocci, 07/02/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.