Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

silence - Re: [silence] Methods Cage used to generate I Ching results

Subject: Scholarly discussion of the music of John Cage.

List archive

Re: [silence] Methods Cage used to generate I Ching results


Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rod Stasick <>
  • To: silence <>
  • Subject: Re: [silence] Methods Cage used to generate I Ching results
  • Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 20:52:42 -0500
  • Authentication-results: eifmailue2p1.az.virginia.edu; spf=permerror (virginia.edu: 192.185.69.18 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of )

But I thought the idea was that, both, the self-alteration and the
reduction of self-_expression_ were accomplished using chance or 
randomization methods? Why then straight-jacket it by devoting 
oneself to the number “64”? Useful, yes, for I-Ching divination but
unnecessarily convoluted if you are looking at the alterations and 
reductions we mentioned earlier that could come from any other
easier (and instantaneous) process of creating surprising results.


R

On Mar 27, 2022, at 15:46, Andrew Culver <> wrote:

Rod

For John (and for me) it was never about “randomness”, as a product (or product modifier). It is about self-alteration. 

Also for John (same but less so for me) it was about reducing self-_expression_.

What was needed, then, was a suitable method. The I Ching with its 64 possibilities came along at the right time, offering a consistent and useable process. I see this more as a practicality—with pleasurable bonuses—than as a devotion.

You are correct that the change to the computer didn’t change the process fundamentally (it did add some variations). What it did alter was the speed and scale, a lot. Which is one reason why his work beginning in 1984 is a distinct period, in my opinion.

AC


On Mar 27, 2022, at 13:04, Rod Stasick <> wrote:

The big poisonous elephant mushroom in the rheum that’s often overlooked tho
is that Cage seemed more devoted to the I-Ching and the number 64 than to the
ideas of pure chance in the most basic way of procedures. Yes, he made the jump
from coin tossing to computer printouts (making his work faster, but taking away
the delightful immediacy of results), but any element outside of “64” and I-Ching
was dismissed. For me tho, the change from a pseudo-random number algorithm 
to a maximally unpredictable (as well as flexible) way of creating randomness was
an immense game-changer in my approach to the randomization of all elements.

R



Now Playing:

‌Sune Karlsson :‌  Linonia Te (Nylon Thread, Board, Beer Can Rings & Table Spoons)

from:






Now Playing:

‌Charles Kellogg:‌ Polish Dance

from:
‌Antique Phonograph Music Program 7/28/2009‌

‌‌Last.FM:



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page