Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

[Brett Sokolow <>]

Hi Holly,

 

I would not use a single decision-maker model at a public university unless you provide an appeal. Too susceptible to due process challenge in the courts.

 

Regards, 

Brett A. Sokolow

Brett A. Sokolow, Esq.
Attorney-at-Law

President & CEO, The NCHERM Group LLC

Founder & Board Chair, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association

Executive Director, The Association of Title IX Administrators 

Publisher, Student Affairs eNews 

 

1109 Lancaster Avenue

Berwyn, PA 19312

Tel. (610) 993-0229 
Fax (610) 993-0228

The NCHERM Group, LLC serves as legal counsel/advisor to 75 campuses and is the leading investigations firm serving higher education.

This e-mail message is from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, do not read it. Please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail at  or by calling 610.993.0229, so that our address record can be corrected.

 

From: "Fratzke, Holly J" <>
Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 1:25 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: Title IX investigation procedure resources

 

I am exploring the investigation/resolution procedures used on college campuses in cases of sexual assault. Specifically the pros and cons of utilizing a single decision maker verses a panel to determine the ruling of the case. Does anyone have any insight into this topic they could share with me or have resources to suggest?

Thank you in advance.

Holly

 

Holly Fratzke RN,CNP

Certified Women’s Health Nurse Practitioner

Health and Wellness Services

Winona State University

Direct-(507)474-5924

Department-(507)457-5160