Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Franklin, Robert (VDH)" <>
- To: jennifer przewoznik <>, "Kades, Roshelle" <>
- Cc: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: Prevalence of VAW
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:19:48 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
|
These might be helpful The Prevalence of Sexual Assault Against People Who Identify as Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual in the United States: A Systematic Review Emily F. Rothman, Deinera Exner and Allyson L. Baughman,. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011 12: 55 This article systematically reviews 75 studies that examine the prevalence of sexual assault victimization among gay or bisexual (GB) men, and lesbian or bisexual
(LB) women, in the United States. All studies were published between 1989 and 2009 and report the results of quantitative research. The authors reviewed the reported prevalence of
lifetime sexual assault victimization (LSA), and where available, childhood sexual assault (CSA), adult sexual assault (ASA), intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA), and hate crime-related
sexual assault (HC). The studies were grouped into those that used a probability or census sampling technique (n=25) and those that used a non-probability or “community-based” sampling
technique (n=50). A total of 139,635 GLB respondents participated in the underlying studies reviewed. Prevalence estimates of LSA ranged from 15.6–85.0% for LB women, and 11.8–54.0% for GB men. Considering the median estimates derived from the collective set
of studies reviewed, LB women were more likely to report CSA, ASA, LSA and IPSA than GB men, whereas GB men were more likely to report HC than LB women. Across all studies, the highest estimates reported were for LSA of LB women (85%), CSA of LB women (76.0%),
and CSA of GB men (59.2%). With some exceptions, studies using non-probability samples reported higher sexual assault prevalence rates than did population-based or census sample studies. The challenges of assessing sexual assault victimization with GLB populations
are discussed, as well as the implications for practice, policy and future research. Barrett, Betty Jo (01/2013). "Intimate Partner Violence Reported by Lesbian-, Gay-, and Bisexual-Identified Individuals Living in Canada:
An Exploration of Within-Group Variations". Journal of gay & lesbian social services (1053-8720), 25 (1), p. 1. DOI: 10.1080/10538720.2013.751887 Although research has examined intimate partner violence (IPV) within lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) communities, contradictory evidence exists
regarding variations in IPV within this diverse population. Using data from a nationally representative Canadian survey, we examined differences in rates and severity of LGB IPV based on sexual orientation, gender, sociodemographic factors, and previous experiences
of discrimination. Individuals who were bisexual, younger, currently single, less educated, and who experienced physical/mental limitations were more likely to experience IPV. Compared to gays and lesbians, bisexuals reported more incidents of violence and
higher rates of injury. Implications for research and theory development are provided. (12/2012). "The
Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence among LGBTQ College Youth: The Role of Minority Stress". Journal of youth and adolescence (0047-2891) Preliminary research suggests that partner violence is a problem among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) college
youth. However, there is no study to date with college youth on the factors associated with perpetration of same-sex partner violence, which is needed to inform prevention efforts specific to this population. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to assess
how facets of minority stress (i.e., sexual-orientation-related victimization, sexual minority stigma, internalized homonegativity, sexual identity concealment) relate to physical, sexual, and psychological partner violence perpetration among LGBTQ college
youth (N = 391; 49 % identified as men; 72 % Caucasian; M age:
20.77 years). At the bivariate level, physical perpetration was related to identity concealment and internalized homonegativity; sexual perpetration was related to internalized homonegativity; and psychological perpetration was related to sexual-orientation-related
victimization. However, at the multivariate level (after controlling for concurrent victimization), psychological perpetration was unrelated to minority stress variables, whereas physical and sexual perpetration were both related to internalized homonegativity;
physical perpetration was also related to identity concealment. These results underscore the utility of understanding partner violence among LGBTQ youth through a minority stress framework. Moreover, the current study highlights the need for a better understanding
of factors that mediate and moderate the relationship between minority stress and partner violence perpetration among LGBTQ youth in order to inform prevention and intervention efforts. Robert L. Franklin, MS Sexual and Domestic Violence Community Outreach Coordinator Division of Prevention & Health Promotion Virginia Department of Health 109 Governor Street, 9th Floor Richmond VA 23219 Phone: (804) 864-7739 Fax: (804) 864-7748 email:
web:
http://www.knowcoercion.com web:
http://www.varapelaws.org web:
http://www.vahealth.org/Injury/sexualviolence/ web:
http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/ofhs/prevention/ From: jennifer przewoznik [mailto:]
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Kades, Roshelle <> wrote: Does anyone have recommended sources (preferably as current as possible) for prevalence of sexual violence, dating violence, and stalking, including gender breakdown and prevalence
specifically in LGBTQ community? I am finding it hard to find stats post year 2000 that are also coming from reliable sources. Roshelle Kades Student Health and Wellness Coordinator If we change our thoughts from 'it's too late' to 'there's still hope', we might see some change in the world.
~ Kellie Elmore
Jen Przewoznik, MSW Director of Prevention and Evaluation |
- Prevalence of VAW, Kades, Roshelle, 09/19/2013
- Re: Prevalence of VAW, jennifer przewoznik, 09/19/2013
- Re: Prevalence of VAW, Elizabeth Schrock, 09/19/2013
- RE: Prevalence of VAW, Jessie Mindlin, 09/19/2013
- RE: Prevalence of VAW, Franklin, Robert (VDH), 09/20/2013
- Re: Prevalence of VAW, Elizabeth Schrock, 09/19/2013
- Re: Prevalence of VAW, jennifer przewoznik, 09/19/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.