Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: due process on campus
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:07:41 +0000
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
- Sensitivity: Normal
I think Wendy's statement that students have no due process rights might
mislead a lot of folks. Rather than jumping into the FERPA discussion, I just
want to clear up that one legal point. Students definitely do have some due
process rights. In fact, the Supreme Court decision requiring that students a
disciplinary hearing system was a due process case. It came out the civil
rights struggles and arose in the context of two black university students
being summarily expelled because there had been a civil rights demonstration
(that they probably never even attended.) In law school one of the first
things they teach you is that due process means notice and an opportunity to
be heard. I'm about as prosecution-oriented as anyone but I don't have a
problem with giving that to accused students. I think some very bad
pro-abusive-student decisions have come down because those very basic
principles were ignored. For example, if an accused student has not been
allowed to call witnesses (and I mean actual witnesses not a string of
character witnesses) whatever other points his lawyer raises on appeal are
given more weight because the school's procedures are already questionable.
FERPA has a tendency to complicate and confuse everyone, which makes it
doubly important not to ignore the more basic legal principles that apply.
Alice Vachss
- due process on campus, alicevachss, 10/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.