Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Caramagno, Denise" <>
- To: "Peters, Sara" <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: Concerns regarding jurisdiction
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:10:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: fort02.mail.virginia.edu; spf=neutral (virginia.edu: 68.232.141.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of )
- Authentication-results: utc.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;utc.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ucsf.edu;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
|
I worked with a UCSF student who was raped by a student from another university. We took our complaint to the respondent’s university. They initiated an investigation.
We met with them and my client was interviewed only to be told weeks later on that the respondent’s attorney asserted they didn’t have jurisdiction because the rape didn’t happen on their campus or to one of their students. They closed the case. Here at
UCSF our Title IX office will investigate any complaint of wrongdoing by any UCSF affiliate. If they don’t have a relationship with the respondent they won’t investigate. That left my client with no recourse.
Denise Caramagno, M.A., M.A., LMFT Confidential CARE Advocate Director Campus Advocacy, Resources, and Education for Sexual Assault and Gender-based Violence Office of Diversity and Outreach University of California at San Francisco 500 Parnassus, Millberry Union East, Room 233 San Francisco, Ca. 94143 Tel: (415) 502-8802 Cell: (415) 640-9080 Pronouns: “She/Her/Hers" Office of Diversity and Outreach E-Brochure Annual Diversity and Outreach Report CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. Distribution,
reproduction, or any other use of this transmission by any party other than the intended recipient is prohibited. From: Peters, Sara [mailto:]
Hi All, We have a case where a UTC student was raped by a student at another university. After putting the student through a long investigative and hearing process, they found the
respondent responsible. The respondent promptly appealed and the decision was overturned based on jurisdiction. There Title IX policy states the following: "the conduct occurs outside the context of a University employment or educational program or activity, but has continuing adverse effects on or creates a
hostile environment for students, employees or third-parties while on campus or University property owned or controlled by the University or in any employment or education program or activity." Basically, because the complainant was not a student they claim they have no jurisdiction over the case. At UTC, we hold all students
accountable for the policy regardless of the identity of the victim or their status as a non-UTC student. Is this not the case at many other universities? If this is not the case, is the complainant informed before an investigation and hearing? I’m a wee bit
upset about how this was handled. Sara K. Peters |
- Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Peters, Sara, 07/10/2017
- RE: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Howard Kallem, 07/10/2017
- RE: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Caramagno, Denise, 07/12/2017
- Re: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Alice Vachss, 07/12/2017
- RE: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Mary A. Wyandt-Hiebert, 07/12/2017
- Re: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Adriane Bang, 07/12/2017
- RE: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Mary A. Wyandt-Hiebert, 07/12/2017
- Re: Concerns regarding jurisdiction, Alice Vachss, 07/12/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.