Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Nancy Cantalupo <>
- To: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Title IX confidentiality issue follow-up
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 17:53:16 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
|
Dear All, I didn’t want this to get lost in my last, long posting. For those of you who watch the C-Span footage of the June 23rd roundtable, you’ll see that at about
minute 2:09 (that’s 2 hours, 9 minutes), Senator McCaskill brings up the issue of Title IX and confidential reporting, and I suggest
that the OCR FAQ approach of allowing schools to make a
choice as to whether some employees (those without privilege) are designated as “responsible employees” or “non-professional counselors or advocates” (OCR’s language, see Q E-3, pg 23 of the FAQs) should be
required. That is, certain employees (I used WC directors, since that was my old role, as an example) should be designated confidential
by law, regardless of whether they have privilege, and that schools should not have the option to
not make them confidential (as the OCR FAQs allow). I received several emails from various members of the higher ed community as a result of those and other comments I made during the roundtable, one of which informed
me of a petition protesting the precipitous closing for the victims’ services/advocacy center at Syracuse University based on Title IX. As you can see in this article
http://www.buzzfeed.com/krystieyandoli/syracuse-university-to-close-advocacy-center-for-sexual-assa, the university seems to be arguing that the OCR guidelines under Title IX
still require the closing of their advocacy center due to confidentiality concerns. That information is incorrect, and a petition has been started that can be found at:
http://www.change.org/petitions/syracuse-university-reinstatement-of-the-advocacy-center-to-provide-confidential-sexual-assault-support-services-at-syracuse-university. I know that this issue has been discussed a lot among the communities represented on these listservs, so I wanted to pass along the information about the Syracuse U.
events and petition. I would also very much appreciate it if others who know of schools that are making similar choices to Syracuse’s (of
not giving confidentiality to “non-professional counselors or advocates”) could let me know about those cases. Best, Nancy
Nancy Chi Cantalupo J.D., B.S.F.S., Georgetown University Researcher, Georgetown Law You can access my scholarship on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=884485 |
- Title IX confidentiality issue follow-up, Nancy Cantalupo, 07/13/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.