Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "LaDue, Lee E." <>
- To: "''" <>
- Subject: Conduct hearing process Question
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:32:46 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
Our campus recently made a procedural change in how they process cases
through the conduct hearing panel. The cases are still presented to the
conduct board and they make a recommendation of responsible or not
responsible and then a recommendation of a sanction. Typically those
"recommendations" in the past have not been significantly changed. The
procedure now is to have another person assigned to listen to the entire
conduct hearing on tape (often difficult to hear) and make a "final"
decision. The final decision in two cases has been the opposite or
significantly different from the recommendation by the hearing panel. For
example, if the hearing board found the person responsible and recommended
suspension, the final decision may still find them responsible but only
sanction with probation or the opposite of that - finding of responsible and
sanction with suspension when the original decision resulted in not
responsible. The procedure now, instead of telling the victim or the accused
of the decision right away, they do not share what the panel decided at all
but only the final decision from this added decision-maker. They also don't
tell the victim the outcome until after the time has passed for the
possibility of an appeal by the accused. So the accused student is learning
the outcome 3 to 5 days before the complainant. (The time it takes for the
final decision maker can be days because they are listening to the tapes all
the way through several times and the hearings can last 4 to 6 hours.) The
board members also do not know that their original decisions have been
changed. Some feel this process is an added layer that provides a check and
balance. However, I am concerned about these changes on a number of levels
but am curious if any other university is using these particular procedures
with an added decision-maker beyond the conduct panel. I am also
interested in any legal opinions regarding this process.
Lee LaDue
Asst. Director/Coordinator - Gender Violence
Prevention Program
St. Cloud State University Women's Center
720 4th Ave. S.
St. Cloud, MN 56301
320/308-3995
The information contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is intended
only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.
Note: Privacy may not be guaranteed as e-mail is not a secure means of
communication. Concerns regarding confidential matters are best addressed by
calling or visiting the Women's Center.
- Conduct hearing process Question, LaDue, Lee E., 05/14/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.