Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 1198, Issue 1
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:54:17 -0400
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
"informed consent", like "effective consent" and "affirmative consent" are
all meaningless, in my opinion - if not harmful - because they modify a word
that burdens victims by suggesting they not only need to consent, but do so
"effectively" and "affirmatively".? This is partly the fault of law itself -
which doesn't put the burden on the offender - as it should - to prove that
he HAD consent.
Reformers are talking about restructuring rape law to allow this burden-shift
- but don't hold your breath.
In the meantime, thinking about the issue differently is helpful
"knowing, intelligent and voluntary consent" is better because it is the
phrase we use to describe an effective waiver of a suspect's Miranda rights.?
Giving up authority over your intimate self should call for an even tougher
standard - though the law has always provided the opposite.
this standard is effective because it warns the potential offender that there
is no consent, ever, if the woman is incapacitated - (something we don't
teach very well in society or law) and it nicely bumps up the burden on the
harmdoer to be certain about whether he HAS consent - rather than exploiting
opportunities where consent is vague -
Buyer-beware should be the theme -
or as i say in my bumper-sticker? approach "KNOW or it's NO"
(No means NO - is a silly idea that not only adds no value to the goal of
prevention - it doesn't promote women's autonomy at all - because it requires
the victim to SAY no - and if she doesn't, then yes is presumed.? This is
backward and offensive.? The presumption is no - period.? Autonomy theory is
better understood in a nonsexual context where we are quite clear that the
right to swing one's fist ends before it hits someone else in the nose.? This
goes for penises and vaginas, too).
Wendy Murphy
-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Sent: Thu, 14 May 2009 9:04 am
Subject: SAPC Digest, Vol 1198, Issue 1
Send SAPC mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAPC digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. interesting front page boston globe story - my letter to the
editor -
()
2. RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 1197, Issue 1 (Kile, Marilyn J)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:32:16 -0400
From:
Subject: interesting front page boston globe story - my letter to the
editor -
To:
Message-ID:
<>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear editor;
In an article discussing whether law enforcement's failure to issue an
alert after a brutal rape in a Boston parking garage may have led to a
second rape by the same man in the same location 11 days later, two
absurd arguments are made, surprisingly enough, by the director of a rape
crisis
center.? 1. An alert might have compromised the
ability to catch the offender because he might change his M.O.? 2.
Notifying the public would have violated the victim's privacy.?
Whether it's a murder, rape or robbery, capturing a criminal requires
widespread disclosure of all identifying information as quickly as
possible after the incident because he might be fleeing the
jurisdiction, and more importantly, he might be looking for another
victim.? Who cares if he learns that cops are onto him or that he
changes his M.O.?? Releasing information enables the public to be more
vigilant in self-protection and assist police with tips on sightings,
etc.? Moreover, if the guy thinks cops are looking for him - he might
actually restrain himself from attacking again.? It's the rapist who
thinks he got away with it who offends again and again.?
And secrecy about such a brutal attack hardly protects the victim's
privacy.? Despite many detailed news reports about the attacks written
after the truth was finally released, it is impossible to figure out
the identities of the victims.? If we don't know who they are now, we
certainly couldn't have figured it out if cops had simply issued an
alert letting the public know what happened and where.? It is painfully
obvious that had an alert been issued after the first rape, the second victim
would not
likely have been attacked by the same man in the same location.? It is
also clear that failure to alert the public was intended to protect
interests other than the well-being of women.? This point was missing
in the Globe's story.
Wendy J. Murphy
New England Law|Boston
617-422-7410
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:53:03 -0500
From: "Kile, Marilyn J"
<>
Subject: RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 1197, Issue 1
To:
""
<>
Message-ID:
<>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:41 PM
To:
Subject: SAPC Digest, Vol 1197, Issue 1
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:07:57 -0400
From: "Suraiya P. Baluch"
<>
Subject: Question about term 'effective consent'
To:
<>
Message-ID:
<>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi All,
We are in the process of revising our sexual assault policy here and
would like to include definition of terms including consent in the
revised policy. Some in our working group have argued that the term
'effective consent' is redundant and merely a education device, rather
than truly a different term than 'consent'. Others have contended that
it is an attempt to get at a different dimension of consent, similar to
the term 'informed consent' used in patient care and research
participation (i.e., one may consent, but unless certain elements are
met, the consent is not valid or in this case, 'effective'). Any
perspectives on this would be appreciated, including references to
writing on this topic. Thanks!
Suraiya Baluch, Ph.D., Director
Sexual Harassment/Assault Advising, Resources & Education (SHARE)
Princeton University Health Services
217 McCosh Health Center
Washington Road
Princeton, NJ 08544
609-258-1898 Telephone
609-258-9737 Fax
The definition of consent in Wisconsin law is
"Consent means words or overt actions by a person who is competent to give
informed consent indicating a freely given agreement to have sexual
intercourse
or sexual contact."
When I'm talking with students, I break this down and explain each element. I
think this covers it well.
Marilyn J. Kile, LCSW
Sexual Assault Prevention Coordinator
2022 Ambrose Health Center
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
800 W. Main St.
Whitewater, WI 53190
www.uww.edu/sart
262-472-1300 X2244
FAX 262-472-1435
The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use
of
the recipient(s) named above and may be confidential privileged information.
If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or authorized by
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by email
and
delete this entire message.
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:40:53 -0500
From: "Foubert, John"
<>
Subject: bystander program
To:
""
<>
Message-ID:
<>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Michelle and others,
With regard to your question about bystander intervention programs for women,
I
am now available to present a program to college women that has a significant
bystander intervention component called "Helping Friends Avoid Rape and
Helping
Survivors to Recover." This is in addition to my established program for men
"How to Help a Sexual Assault Survivor: What Men Can Do."
I also have begun to do presentations on the harms done by pornography called
"Uncovering the Truth about Pornography." I'm now booking dates for all
three
of these presentations for this fall and can be contacted at
<mailto:>
or at 405-338-8046.
John Foubert
**************************************
John D. Foubert, Ph.D., LLC
Associate Professor and Program Coordinator
College Student Development Master's Degree Program
Oklahoma State University
School of Educational Studies
314 Willard Hall
Stillwater, OK 74078
(405) 744-1480
(405) 744-7758 fax
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
End of SAPC Digest, Vol 1197, Issue 1
*************************************
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
End of SAPC Digest, Vol 1198, Issue 1
*************************************
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 1198, Issue 1, wmurphylaw, 05/14/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.