Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Linda Langford" <>
- To: <>, <>, <>
- Subject: RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:49:07 -0500
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
Wendy -
I agree with you that institutions should explore the options you were
talking about. When I said "institutions can't control content," I was
thinking specifically of something like a town meeting or series of
small discussions or maybe letters to the editor -- organized BY
students FOR students -- in order to facilitate dialogue about their
values related to an issue. For those types of activities, the
administration wouldn't tell students what the content of the meeting
(or whatever) has to be.....but could certainly help prepare the
students to facilitate discussions of this type, or perhaps do something
like provide an outside facilitator if the students wanted that. I was
trying to brainstorm what other avenues might exist for institutional
action in addition to rules and technological options.
Linda
Linda Langford, Sc.D.
Associate Center Director, Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other
Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 1:10 PM
To: Langford, Linda;
;
Subject: Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus
These educational ideas are wonderful, Linda - but the truth is, schools
CAN control content, just as they can block access to child porn.
Filters are better than ever - and even if they don't work well -
schools can and should explicit set forth policies against speech that
rises to the level of harassment -
just having a rule about it is better than nothing - and most schools
have nothing
students will think twice about harassing any student based on race,
gender etc - if they think they could get in trouble -
wendy
-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Langford
<>
To:
;
;
Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:02 am
Subject: RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus
One approach to this issue is to look at the institution's legal
responsibilities, and I think we should do that. In addition to the
institution
acting within its abilities to prevent and sanction directly, I wonder
how
institutions might also help create opportunities for *students* to
express what
kind of environment they'd like to live in and how they feel about
certain types
of speech. For example, researchers have collected data showing that
most
students feel uncomfortable around sexist and racist speech, and many
think they
are more uncomfortable than other students (i.e., "I am uncomfortable,
but
others around me are ok with it.") Often there are students on campus
who feel
strongly about these issues and want to take leadership in raising them
for
discussion, and they could make good use of data like these in
generating
dialogue. Given the limits of what institutions can (and perhaps should)
mandate, it seems like we should also try to think about ways to support
students in creating a community discussion among themselves about what
behaviors and words are offensive and/or harmful. Obviously the
institution
cannot control the *content* of these discussions, but certainly can
provide
time, space, data, advisors, etc. I've heard of campuses responding to
bias
incidents this way, e.g., with town meetings, vigils, etc. in which
students are
able to publicly express their negative feelings about what happened and
their
support for the victim. There are certainly risks with this approach,
especially
with specific situations which might evoke a "blame the victim"
response, but I
do think it might have potential for addressing cyber-communication in
particular.
Has anyone tried something like this approach who could speak to how it
worked (or didn't)?
Linda
Linda Langford, Sc.D.
Associate Center Director, Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other
Drug
Abuse and Violence Prevention
www.HigherEdCenter.org
55 Chapel Street, Newton, MA 02458-1060
voice (800) 676-1730 x2719 OR (617) 618-2719 (direct line)
fax (617) 928-1537
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:
<mailto:?>
]
On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:57 PM
To:
;
Subject: Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus
How do universities stop graffiti hate-harassment speech - painted on
the walls
of campus buildings?
Do they punish known offenders for violating the rights of black
students if the
writer uses prolific N-word and KKK speech to express their hatred in
spray
paint all over campus?
wendy
-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
;
Sent: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:30 am
Subject: Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus
Wendy,
?
I agree that online harassment is vexing, but with no control over the
harasser or the harassment, how can a Title IX complaint stick?? Also,
how
can a university respond to vicious postings without running afoul of
the 1st
Amendment?
?
Regards,
Brett A. Sokolow
Brett A. Sokolow, J.D.
Attorney-At-Law
"Best Practices for Student Health and Safety"
The National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, Ltd.
(a not-for-profit corporation)
20 Callery Way
Malvern, PA 19355-2969
Tel.(610) 993-0229
Fax (610) 993-0228
www.ncherm.org
2009 President, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association
(www.nabita.org)
?
In a message dated 2/9/2009 1:26:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
writes:
As I mentioned last week - Juicy Campus shut down its website after I
filed an OCR complaint against a university that refused to take steps
to stop the brutal sexual harassment of a female student.
As predicted, however, another
site popped up immediately - and began disseminating the same
information.
Thus, we are pressing ahead with our OCR complaint.?
I wanted to let you all know because the case I filed is unprecedented
and would require schools to take steps to prevent the use of the
internet as
a venue for the dissemination of harmful speech based on race, gender,
ethnicity, religion - etc - something that I have not yet seen (at
least not
in the context of sexual harassment speech)
The IT experts with whom
I've spoken have given me lots of simple ideas for ways schools can
easily
prevent sites like Juicy Campus from facilitating sexual harassment.
If any of you have ideas - feel free to send them backchannel.
Wendy Murphy
617-422-7410
_______________________________________________
- OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/09/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/09/2009
- RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, Linda Langford, 02/10/2009
- Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/10/2009
- RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, Linda Langford, 02/10/2009
- Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/10/2009
- RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, Linda Langford, 02/10/2009
- Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/10/2009
- RE: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, Linda Langford, 02/10/2009
- Re: OCR complaint involving Juicy Campus, wmurphylaw, 02/09/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.