Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 848, Issue 1
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:19:03 -0400
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
Actually Brett -- the opinion you sent supports both my points --
it's very long so i include only the relevant sections here: - my thoughts
are in ALL CAPS
Wendy
FERPA defines "education records" as "those records, files, documents, and
other materials which -
(i) contain information directly related to a student; and
(ii)are maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person
acting for such agency or institution.
FERPA applies to the disclosure of tangible records and of information
derived from tangible records. FERPA does not protect the confidentiality of
information in general, and, therefore, does not apply to the disclosure of
information derived from a source other than education records, even if
education records exist which contain that information. THIS SENTENCE CLEARLY
INDICATES THAT FERPA DOES NOT APPLY TO EVIDENCE "DERIVED FROM" OUTSIDE
SOURCES, SUCH AS CIVILIAN POLICE RECORDS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION
GATHERED BY THE SCHOOL FROM NON-SCHOOL SOURCES. As a general rule,
information that is obtained through personal knowledge or observation, and
not from an education record, is not protected from disclosure under FERPA.
In July 1992, FERPA was amended to remove an impediment to the release of
records created and maintained by a school's law enforcement unit for a law
enforcement purpose. Specifically, FERPA was amended to exempt from the
definition of "education records" the following:
[R]ecords maintained by a law enforcement unit of the educational agency or
institution that were created by that law enforcement unit for the purpose of
law enforcement.
20 U.S.C. §1232g(a)(4)(ii). The amendment neither requires nor prohibits the
release of law enforcement unit records, but allows schools to follow their
own policies or applicable State law. Accordingly, FERPA no longer prevents a
campus law enforcement division from disclosing to outside parties law
enforcement unit records, including campus security incident reports, that
were created by the law enforcement unit for a law enforcement purpose.
The FERP A regulations define a "law enforcement unit" as the following:
(a)(l) "Law enforcement unit" means any individual, office, department,
division, or other component of an educational agency or institution, such as
a unit of commissioned police officers or non-commissioned security guards,
that is officially authorized or designated by that agency or institution to -
(i) Enforce any local, State, or Federal law, or refer to appropriate
authorities a matter for enforcement of any local, State, or Federal law
again any individual or organization other than the agency or institution
itself; and
(ii) Maintain the physical security and safety of the agency or institution.
34 CFR §99.8(a)(l)(i)(ii). The regulations also define "law enforcement
records" as follows:
(b)(1) Records of a law enforcement unit means those records, files,
documents, and other materials that are -
(i) Created by a law enforcement unit; Created
(ii) for a law enforcement purpose; and
Maintained by the law enforcement unit.
34 CFR §99.8(b)(l)(i)-(iii).
...
If an institution has a security unit or individual with a dual role or
function of enforcing institutional rules of conduct related to safety and
security and referring potential or alleged violations of law to government
authorities, that unit or individual would be considered a "law enforcement
unit" under FERPA. Under the new amendment, records of that unit are were
created and maintained for a law enforcement purpose are considered records
of a law enforcement unit and, therefore, excluded from the definition of
"education records" under FERPA.
[W]here a law enforcement unit also performs non-law enforcement functions,
the records created and maintained by that unit are considered law
enforcement unit records, even where those records were created for dual
purposes (e.g. for both law enforcement and disciplinary purposes). Only
records that were created and maintained by the unit exclusively for a
non-law enforcement purpose will not be considered records of a law
enforcement unit.
...
Therefore, with regard to your specific question - when should student
witness statements and reports made by school security staff be considered
law enforcement records and when should they be considered education records
subject to FERPA - the answer to this question depends on who created the
records, for what purpose the records were created, and who maintains the
records. We believe that the discussion on this matter in the same preamble
in the Federal Register referenced above will shed some light on the meaning
of the regulations:
[I]f a campus security unit initiates an investigation into an incident on
campus relating to a possible violation of law or the student conduct code,
the record created and maintained by the unit in connection with this
investigation is a law enforcement unit record, whether or not it is ever
referred to the local police authorities. If, however, the same unit or
individual responsible for law enforcement investigates an incident for the
purposes of internal disciplinary actions and created a records exclusively
for the purpose of a possible disciplinary action against the student, that
record would not be considered a record of a law enforcement unit and would
be an "education record" subject to FERPA. THUS, AS I SUGGESTED EARLIER, THE
ONLY REAL ISSUE IS WHETHER LAW ENFORCEMENT CONDUCTS AN INVESTIGATION FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES, AND MY ASSUMPTION IS THAT A SEXUAL ASSAULT IS ALWAYS A
CRIME - WHETHER OR NOT IT IS PROSECUTED -- THUS SHOULD ALWAYS BE INVESTIGATED
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES, ESPECIALLY SINCE THERE CAN BE NO DETERMINATION
IN THE IMMEDIATE AFTERMATH WHETHER IT WILL BE TREATED AS LAW ENFORCEMENT VS.
DISCIPLINARY. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS ASSUMED A SEXUAL ASSAULT, LIKE ANY
CRIME, WILL BE INVESTIGATED AS AT LEAST A LAW ENFORCEMENT MATTER AS WELL AS A
DISCIPLINARY MATTER, WHETHER OR NOT IT ENDS UP AS AN ACTIVE PROSECUTION.
THIS POINT IS SUPPORTED BY THE NEXT SENTENCE IN THE DECISION: It should be
stressed that the Secretary expects such occasions to be very rare,
especially when incidents involving criminal conduct by students at
postsecondary institutions. IN OTHER WORDS -- THE PRESUMPTION IS THAT
CRIMINAL CONDUCT WILL BE INVESTIGATED AS LAW ENFORCEMENT, NOT DISCIPLINARY
ACTIVITY FOR FERPA PURPOSES.
...
Additionally, FERPA would permit the District to disclose personally
identifiable information from a student's education record under FERPA's
health and safety emergency provision: This provision allows an educational
agency or institution to disclose personally identifiable information from
education records, without prior written consent,
Hi Wendy,
Here's the cite:
_http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/library/montcounty0215.html_
(http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/library/montcounty0215.html)
I am not saying the outside document become privileged by FERPA...I am
saying the copy retained by an administrator is governed by FERPA as to what
that
administrator does with it. The copy the outside law enforcement agency has
is not governed by FERPA, even if it is shared with a FERPA-governed entity.
Does that clarify?
Regards,
Brett A. Sokolow, JD
Special Advisor to the United States Air Force Academy
Special Counsel to the VP for Student Affairs, Saint Mary's College (IN)
Special Counsel to the President, Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Special Counsel for AOD Issues, Barton County Community College
Special Counsel for Student Conduct Issues, Warren Wilson College
Special Counsel to the Dean of Students, Hendrix College
President, The National Center for
Higher Education Risk Management, Ltd.
"Best Practices for Student Health and Safety"
(a not-for-profit corporation)
20 Callery Way
Malvern, PA 19355-2969
Tel. (610) 993-0229
Fax (610) 993-0228
www.ncherm.org
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAPC mailing list
https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sapc
End of SAPC Digest, Vol 848, Issue 1
************************************
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 848, Issue 1, wmurphylaw, 10/24/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 848, Issue 1, BASokolow, 10/24/2007
- Information overload and more questions, Aline Jesus Rafi, 10/24/2007
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 848, Issue 1, S. Daniel Carter, 10/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.