Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Adriane Bang <>
- To: "Broussard, Julia A" <>
- Cc: "Attis-Springs, Marie" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: Window Cling
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 12:55:53 -0600
- Authentication-results: fort02.mail.virginia.edu; spf=pass (virginia.edu: domain of designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender)
Boise State University
1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725-1335
Phone: (208) 426-4259
Website: genderequity.boisestate.edu
Pronouns: she/her/hers
Hello Marie,
I am happy to provide some perspective from Tulane. Our window clings were very well received by campus, and, as far as I know, we received no pushback. The only slight difficulty we had is that our student union building has some really strict building policies so we had to get special permission to put up the mirror clings. But we were able to get the permission. Our goal with the mirror clings was to make them ubiquitous on campus so that everyone would be more aware of resources and to convey that this is an issue that Tulane cares about. Based on anecdotal evidence, I think we have been successful in literally getting the issue in people’s faces with the mirror clings. We have had staff and students ask us to replenish them in buildings on campus.
In regards to #2, our health promotion office has used window clings for other health issues, including encouraging proper hand washing during flu season. I think they can definitely be used to cover other health issues.
Happy to answer any questions people may have about how we have used them at Tulane!
Best,
Julia
Julia Broussard, MSW, LCSW
Title IX Program Manager
Tulane University | Office of Academic Affairs & Provost
Gibson 200 | New Orleans, LA 70118
504.314.2897 |
titleix.tulane.edu
From: <> On Behalf Of Attis-Springs, Marie
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 11:49 AM
To:
Subject: Window Cling
Hello all,
I was inspired by a question posed about a year ago on this listserv regarding mirror clings for Non-confidential verses Confidential victim/survivor resources . Some of you even shared visuals of yours on here ( I remember Tulane's One wave and and MIT's Title IX map , pretty vividly). So I was inspired to create one for our institution and was posed a few valid and probably common questions:
#1 Are there any downsides? Could someone argue that having these everywhere might convey to external visitors like elected officials, donors and prospective students that we have a bigger problem with sexual assault here than other campuses?
#2 Why we would not want to broaden this to not be a mirror cling solely about confidential and non confidential sources, but perhaps a space for social norms marketing about Alcohol, drugs, sexual assault, etc. Why are we recommending only this singular focus?
I'm hoping I could pick your brains particularly on your thoughts on number one. By the way, there are all kinds of other social norms messaging (from AOD, suicide to sexuality) all over our campus.
I think I have #2 covered, but please comment and advise on both. My argument is that this cling is about timing. It is specifically targeted (but not limited) to recent victims/survivors as an immediate resource after an assault. I'm talking as recent as the perpetrator might be in the next room and the assault might have occurred just minutes ago. However, promoting our resources in anyway shows that our institution is proactive and are conscience that survivors may not have, or may not be thinking that there is support for them right after an assault. But since most victims of rape (if they are able) use the bathroom and often look into a mirror, then what better way to remind them that we are there for them.
If anyone has any data to support my claim to using these clings, please share as well.
Thanks in advance,
Marie
Marie D. Attis-Springs, MPA
Prevention Education Specialist & Coordinator
O
ffice of Violence Prevention
(201) 684-7430
505 Ramapo Valley Road
Mahwah, NJ 07430
“It was a catch-22: If you didn’t put the trauma behind you, you couldn’t move on. But if you did put the trauma behind you, you willingly gave up your claim to the person you were before it happened.”
Victim? Survivor?---- PERSPECTIVE--- Who are we to judge?
**Summer Office Hours** Monday thru Thursday 8:00AM – 5:15PM Closed on Fridays
FERPA Statement
The attached information has been forwarded to you with the understanding that it will not be released to other parties. The Family Education Rights and Privacy Acts of 1974, as amended, prohibits the release of this information without the student’s written consent. Please respond to this e-mail and provide written confirmation that you have deleted all files if you are unable to comply with the condition of this release.
Confidentiality Notice:
This email transmission (including any attachments) is for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information which is protected under federal and/or state laws. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message
==============
To unsubscribe from this list,
send email to:
==============
- Window Cling, Attis-Springs, Marie, 07/03/2018
- Re: Window Cling, Rob Buelow, 07/03/2018
- RE: Window Cling, Broussard, Julia A, 07/03/2018
- Re: Window Cling, Adriane Bang, 07/03/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.