Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
Re: Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence
Chronological Thread
- From: "S. Daniel Carter" <>
- To: Brett Sokolow <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:46:26 -0500
- Authentication-results: fort02.mail.virginia.edu; spf=pass (virginia.edu: domain of designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender)
To Brett & Others,
I wholeheartedly agree with Brett’s assessment. This is a dangerous bill from intent to construction.
One of the things I heard about the committee hearing where it was sent to the Utah state House floor was that there were no statistics cited by those in opposition. Given that it is roughly similar to Virginia’s law, enacted after the Rolling Stone article, I was wondering if anybody is aware of data on how that law has impacted reporting?
Also, I’m trying to put together some organized resistance to it in Utah. Is there anybody on this list from the state, or who knows colleagues there, who would be interested in passing along feedback to the legislature? -- S. Daniel Carter, President Safety Advisors for Educational Campuses, LLC Inspire - Engage - Equip - Empower http://safecampuses.biz P.O. Box 2019, Thomson, GA 30824 202-684-6471 | Fax 706-522-9196
From: <> on behalf of Brett Sokolow <>
The standard might make more sense as “emergency” rather than articulable threat, but it still would create a potential slippery slope. And, the bizarre thing in all these bills is the assumption that survivors cannot go to the police directly themselves, somehow, and that a school should paternalistically step into that role. I think, arguably, there is already a duty to notify law enforcement of jurisdiction (campus or local law enforcement) in emergencies, either in fact or in practice in most states. Any bill that seeks to lower the threshold for campus reporting will likely have exactly the effect that this blog asserts. “Articulable threat” is a somewhat meaningless standard as well (of course, so can “emergency” be if not defined). In some states and the proposed HEA, this is a cynical attempt at different levels and in different ways to create a poison pill to the effectiveness of Title IX.
Regards, Brett A. Sokolow Brett A. Sokolow, Esq. Attorney-at-Law
President & CEO, The NCHERM Group LLC Founder & Board Chair, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association Executive Director, The Association of Title IX Administrators Publisher, Student Affairs eNews, Title IX Today
1109 Lancaster Avenue Berwyn, PA 19312 Tel. (610) 993-0229 Fax (610) 993-0228
The NCHERM Group, LLC serves as legal counsel/advisor to 75 campuses and is the leading investigations firm serving higher education.
This e-mail message is from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, do not read it. Please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail at or by calling 610.993.0229, so that our address record can be corrected.
From: <> on behalf of "S. Daniel Carter" <>
============== |
- Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence, S. Daniel Carter, 02/17/2018
- Re: Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence, Brett Sokolow, 02/18/2018
- Re: Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence, S. Daniel Carter, 02/22/2018
- Re: Mandatory Reporting to Off-Campus Police Isn’t the Solution to Campus Sexual Violence, Brett Sokolow, 02/18/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.



