Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sapc - respondent questioning procedure

Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

List archive

respondent questioning procedure


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Megan Elizabeth Selheim <>
  • To: "''" <>
  • Subject: respondent questioning procedure
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:17:55 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

We currently have hearings after every investigative report that comes back with a finding of responsible. Our hearing procedure is a mess, but for those of you who have hearings, I’m wondering how you handle the respondent/respondent’s advisor questioning complainants. We’ve attempted to prevent direct questioning, but it was handled awkwardly and now we’ve basically defaulted to the respondent/advisor being able to question complainants directly.

 

Anything you all have to share on how your institutions handle those interactions is appreciated. Thanks!

 

 

--

Megan Selheim

STOP Violence Program Coordinator

Dean of Students Office

Dept. 3135, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie WY 82071-2000

106 Knight Hall

307-766-3296

www.uwyo.edu/stop

 

Confidentiality Notice 
The information contained in this e-mail message or in any attachments may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail message and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy, use or disclose to any other person any part of this e-mail message or of any attachments for any purpose. Any metadata contained in any attachment was sent inadvertently and should not be examined.

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page