Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sapc - Re: advisors and investigation timelines

Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

List archive

Re: advisors and investigation timelines


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Brett Sokolow <>
  • To: Megan Elizabeth Selheim <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: advisors and investigation timelines
  • Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:50:04 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: ; spf=softfail (: domain of does not designate 108.166.43.117 as permitted sender)
  • Authentication-results: fort01.mail.virginia.edu; spf=softfail (virginia.edu: domain of does not designate 108.166.43.117 as permitted sender)

You are not required to delay at all. As a courtesy I usually permit a short delay, but you need to keep to the 60+/- day goal to the best of your ability, and heel dragging by defense counsel is not a cause for delay that OCR will find to be valid. 

 

Regards, 

Brett A. Sokolow

Brett A. Sokolow, Esq.
Attorney-at-Law

President & CEO, The NCHERM Group LLC

Founder & Board Chair, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association

Executive Director, The Association of Title IX Administrators 

Publisher, Student Affairs eNews 

 

*PLEASE NOTE NEW MAILING ADDRESS*

1109 Lancaster Avenue

Berwyn, PA 19312

Tel. (610) 993-0229 
Fax (610) 993-0228

The NCHERM Group, LLC serves as legal counsel/advisor to 75 campuses

This e-mail message is from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, do not read it. Please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail at  or by calling 610.993.0229, so that our address record can be corrected.

 

From: Megan Elizabeth Selheim <>
Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 12:41 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: advisors and investigation timelines

 

We’ve had a few cases (and we have one right now) where our initial interview with a Respondent is being scheduled for several weeks after the initial complaint, due to the fact that the Respondent has chosen an independent attorney as their advisor and that attorney has scheduling conflicts that need to be accommodated.

 

Is there any guidance on how much time we have to allow, and if there is a point at which we can require an interview without the chosen advisor due to timeline constraints? I’m honestly not sure how much of the delay in these cases is due to actual scheduling conflicts, and how much is due to defense attorney delay tactics.

 

Any insight is appreciated. Thanks!

 

--

Megan Selheim

STOP Violence Program Coordinator

Dean of Students Office

Dept. 3135, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie WY 82071-2000

106 Knight Hall

307-766-3296

www.uwyo.edu/stop

 

Confidentiality Notice 
The information contained in this e-mail message or in any attachments may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail message and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy, use or disclose to any other person any part of this e-mail message or of any attachments for any purpose. Any metadata contained in any attachment was sent inadvertently and should not be examined.

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page