Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Heskin, Jessica R" <>
- To: Eva Suzanne Ball <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: hypotherical situation
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:52:24 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
|
I am a one-person shop, so to speak, so I don’t have another advocate to assign them to. This situation has happened to me a couple times before. In my opinion it is a conflict of interest.
I work closely with off-campus DV/SA agencies which I refer one of the clients to. I do advise the advocate from those agencies about our internal processes so that they can work within those protocols. Hope that helps. Jessica Heskin, M.A. Violence and Sexual Assault Support Services California State University, Sacramento The Well 6000 J Street Sacramento, CA 95819-6045 (916) 278-3799 From: Eva Suzanne Ball [mailto:]
I have a hypothetical situation for your consideration: -
Person A identifies as a stalking victim, being stalked by Person B.
-
Person A seeks and receives services from my office (which serves survivors of stalking, relationship violence and sexual assault). -
Days later, person B seeks services for relationship abuse, identifies person A as the perpetrator. Other points to consider: My office is staffed by two people. In this hypothetical situation no formal charges have been brought against either person. Would it be a conflict of interest to serve both people (assigning a different advocate to each person)? Would it go against a victim-centered service model to deny services to either party? How might you handle this situation? I appreciate your input! Peace and thanks, Eva Eva Ball, MSW Coordinator Sexual Violence Response Services and Advocacy CARE (Center for Awareness, Response & Education) Addressing Sexual Violence & Promoting Healthy Sexuality Health Promotion & Wellness Northwestern University 847-491-2054 |
- hypotherical situation, Eva Suzanne Ball, 11/07/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Marie Attis, 11/07/2012
- Re: hypotherical situation, Bernstein, Lauren (LB), 11/07/2012
- Re: hypotherical situation, Bernstein, Lauren (LB), 11/07/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Gaurav Jashnani, 11/07/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Eva Suzanne Ball, 11/09/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Gaurav Jashnani, 11/07/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Heskin, Jessica R, 11/07/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Sarah Holdwick, 11/07/2012
- Re: hypotherical situation, Connie Adams, 11/08/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Sarah Holdwick, 11/07/2012
- Re: hypotherical situation, Clara Porter, 11/08/2012
- RE: hypotherical situation, Marie Attis, 11/07/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.