Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Brett Sokolow <>
- To: Clara Porter <>, Rebecca Lewis Alexander <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:58:15 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
I think this is scrambling Clery and Title IX in unhelpful ways. See if this helps at all. WHO IS A MANDATED REPORTER, OF WHAT? -- GETTING SOME CLARITY BY:
BRETT A. SOKOLOW, ESQ., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ATIXA (www.atixa.org) One of the
most frequent questions we receive at ATIXA is about the sexual misconduct
reporting responsibilities of campus employees, especially faculty
members. The question is complicated by
the fact that three federal laws each impact this duty differently. The Clery
Act Imposes duty
to report incidents in 15 different crime categories (including sex offenses)
by all “campus security authorities,” defined as officials who have significant
responsibility for student and campus activities. That is a broad requirement, including
coaches, RAs, student affairs administrators, housing/residential life, andmany other offices and departments. It
will also include faculty members who have significant responsibility, defined
as doing more than teach, such as advising student organizations, coordinating
extern and internships, mentoring programs, etc. Counselors, health service providers and
clergy are voluntary reporters under the Clery Act, not mandated. No personally identifiable information needs
to be shared by the reporter to satisfy this requirement. It is a real-time reporting requirement where
you share information on incidents with Public Safety as soon as you know about
the incident. Title VII Because the
law can impose liability on employers for sexual harassment by employees,
colleges tend to impose duties to report broadly, either on all employees, or
at least on all supervisory employees. Some faculty members will become mandated to report, therefore, by
virtue of their supervisor status. Title IX Title IXuses the concept of notice, and imposes obligations for a “prompt and effective
remedy” on colleges and universities when notice of sex/gender discrimination
or harassment is given to a “responsible employee.” A school has notice if a responsible employeeknew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, about the
harassment. A responsible employee includes any employee who has the authority
to take action to redress the harassment, who has the duty to report sexualharassment to appropriate school officials, or an individual who a student
could reasonably believe has this authority or responsibility. Your college or university will define for
you if you are a “responsible employee.”
Some faculty members will be, and some will not. Your duties to report may vary based on the law, the situation andyour role. Here are some guidelines:
WHAT HAPPENS ONCE YOU HAVE NOTICE? In all instances where you have notice (and Clara is right, the identity of the perp and location is notice, though I don't see a need to scramble IP addressed under Title IX at all — we're not required to seek notice which is why anonymous reporting systems are very workable), an investigation is required. Initially, that will be a small "i", preliminary investigation. In the small i, we might look into patterns, repeat perpetration, violent tendencies, etc., without disempowering a victim or taking away control over the process. The task is to essentially confirm that it is responsible to honor a victim’s request for no action or to determine what action to take if the victim desires a formal response. I think we always conduct the little i investigation, but only conduct the big I full formal investigation when we have the victim’s consent, or we feel an obligation to act to protect our community. I also want us to consider that the legal duties imposed on colleges by Title IX are not our only duties. Warning and protecting from foreseeable harm are duties on colleges imposed by state negligence laws. So, Title IX is not the whole story here. Some university counsel and coordinators are overreacting to the DCL, though, such as imposing mandated reporting on RAs for all information they have. That will create a chilling effect on reporting. One of the biggest misunderstandings is that conducting the big I investigation requires the involvement of the victim. Whenever we can, I advise that if we MUST pursue a big I investigation without the victim’s consent, we do everything in our power to minimize her (or his) entanglement, and take action to protect from retaliation. Often, our ability to address the conduct and implement remedies does not implicate a formal conduct process, or require that we drag the victim into the role of complainant in that process. Another misunderstanding is chasing down notice, by pursuing every rumor or anonymous report to ascertain more. That’s not what constructive notice means, and our duties to act only commence upon actual or constructive notice to a responsible employee. Regards, Brett A. Sokolow Managing Partner, The National Center for Higher Education Risk Management (www.ncherm.org) Executive Director, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association (www.nabita.org) Executive Director, The Association of Title IX Administrators (www.atixa.org)
From: Clara Porter <> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:27:01 -0500 To: Rebecca Lewis Alexander <>, "" <> Subject: Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting If the university has the name of the perpetrator and the location of the crime then certainly the university would be "on notice" and have an obligation to report and investigate the crime. In setting up this kind of system you definitely want to be sure to instal an IP scrambler so that there is no way to track who made the report. If you do not have one then the university may be obligated to track down the reporting party! Yikes. Clara Porter, Coordinator Interpersonal Violence Prevention University of Southern Maine 112 Upton Hall, Gorham 780-4218 office 232-0484 cell >>> "Alexander, Rebecca Lewis" <> 5/1/2012 4:35 PM >>> Hello, All, We are revising our Sexual Misconduct policy and are interested in implementing an option for either confidential or anonymous reporting of sexual misconduct through a public safety website. The question that arose is this: “under Clary, is there a mandate to report if the perpetrator is named (in the confidential/anonymous report)”? Anyone have any feedback on this topic? Also, if anyone has any input regarding their experience with this type of reporting, it would also be appreciated. Thanks so much, Rebecca Rebecca Alexander, LMFT Counselor, OASIS Program Coordinator East Tennessee State University DP Culp Center, Rm 345 Johnson City TN 37614 423-439-4841 |
- Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Alexander, Rebecca Lewis, 05/01/2012
- Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Clara Porter, 05/02/2012
- Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Brett Sokolow, 05/02/2012
- RE: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Alexander, Rebecca Lewis, 05/02/2012
- Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Brett Sokolow, 05/02/2012
- RE: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Alexander, Rebecca Lewis, 05/02/2012
- Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Brett Sokolow, 05/02/2012
- Re: Anonymous/Confidential Reporting, Clara Porter, 05/02/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.
