Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: Brett Sokolow <>
- To: "S. Daniel Carter" <>, Melinda Dubois <>, SAPC List Serv <>
- Cc: Alison Kiss <>, Melissa Lucchesi <>
- Subject: RE: Sexual Assault options document
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:05:52 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
I would caution, too, about viewing OCR as the definitive answer on the duty to investigate. Title IX imposes one level of duty, but state negligence law imposes another, and acting to protect the campus community from a predator or pattern offender despite a victim’s wish for anonymity may be part of our duty of care (protecting the next victim, essentially). I also think OCR in the DCL and in the 2001 Guidance doesn’t do service to the concept of initial investigation v. comprehensive investigation. The former is always needed, while the latter may depend on a number of factors, including the victim’s consent to proceed. Regards,
Special Counsel to Dominican University (IL) Special Advisor to Whittier College Special Counsel to the University of the Pacific Special Counsel to Wesley College Special Counsel to the University of Arizona From: S. Daniel Carter [mailto:] Melinda, SOC has a “know-your-rights” document and I’ll have my colleague Melissa Lucchesi get back to you about that when she is back in the office next week. With respect to Title IX investigations I think it is important to remember that the April “Dear Colleague” letter makes extensive references back to OCR’s 2001 guidance. That guidance, available at http://www2.ed.gov/offices/OCR/archives/pdf/shguide.pdf, discusses in greater detail what OCR expects in terms of an investigation. You are correct that they held that personally identifying information should be shared with the Title IX Coordinator – but they also state that it may be appropriate for that person to simply retain information about the accused to document a possible pattern. They are not necessarily compelled to interview the accused – absent evidence that students other than an individual accuser who wants nothing done are facing a hostile environment. We are working on getting a further clarification of this as well. ******************************** S. Daniel Carter Director of Public Policy Security On Campus, Inc. phone: (202) 684-6471 http://www.securityoncampus.org/ e-mail: From: Melinda Dubois <> Hi everyone, -- -- Melinda DuBois LMSW585-245-5736 |
- Sexual Assault options document, Melinda Dubois, 07/20/2011
- RE: Sexual Assault options document, Brett Sokolow, 07/20/2011
- Re: Sexual Assault options document, S. Daniel Carter, 07/20/2011
- RE: Sexual Assault options document, Brett Sokolow, 07/20/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.
