Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

Just to be clear, the UVA policy is "intent to harm" not "intent to have sexual contact" or "intent to have sex without consent."

 

Regards,
Brett A. Sokolow
Brett A. Sokolow, J.D.
Attorney-At-Law


"Best Practices for Campus Health and Safety"

The National Center for Higher
Education Risk Management, Ltd.
(a not-for-profit corporation)
20 Callery Way
Malvern, PA 19355-2969
Tel. (610) 993-0229
Fax (610) 993-0228
Brett Blogs! at www.ncherm.org

2009-2010 President, The National Behavioral Intervention Team Association (www.nabita.org)

NCHERM serves as counsel/advisor to 12 campuses, including:

Special Counsel to the Dean of Students, Dominican University (IL)
Special Counsel for Student Conduct Issues, Warren Wilson College
Special Advisor to the University of Texas, San Antonio
Special Counsel, Concordia University (TX)
Special Counsel, Northern Virginia Community College
Special Counsel, Southwestern Michigan College
Special Counsel, the Community College of Allegheny County
Special Advisor, Vassar College
Special Advisor, Henry Ford Community College

 

In a message dated 12/16/2010 11:55:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, writes:

Hi Adale,
I might be niave, but I struggle to believe so many cases are "unintentional."  Has the committee reviewed the work of David Lisak?

Adriane Bang, LMSW
Violence Awareness & Response Coordinator
Boise State University Women's Center
1910 University Drive
Boise, Idaho 83725
208-426-2406

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Sholock, Adale <> wrote:

A group of us are rewriting the sexual misconduct policy at WCU, and we are having some difficulty agreeing upon definitions. I was hoping to get some advice and input from this list.

 

My team and I have agreed upon the need for categories such as effective consent, sexual exploitation, sexual harassment, and stalking. However, there has been contentious conversation around the idea of having two separate categories for sexual assault. In short, the proposal is that Sexual Assault I would refer to “intentional” acts whereas Sexual Assault II would refer to “unintentional” acts. Sexual Assault I would be more severe in punishment than Sexual Assault II. It seems that UVA and UC San Diego do something similar to this with their policies.

 

The idea is that a delineation between “intentional” and “unintentional” would broaden the conception of sexual assault to include those complicated situations involving non-strangers, alcohol, poor communication, and lack of understanding regarding effective consent. As a result of this more inclusive definition, our hope is that: 1) survivors would be more able to identify their experiences as sexual assault and come forward for help; 2) we would challenge “stranger danger” messages; 3) we would emphasize the need for effective consent rather than one’s intentions to assault someone.  

 

Any thoughts?

 

Best,

Adale  

 

Adale Sholock, Ph.D.

Director, Women's Center

Director, Institute for Women

220 Lawrence Center

West Chester University

West Chester, PA 19038

t: 610-436-2122

e:

www.wcupa.edu/womenscenter

 

Become a Fan of the Women's Center!