Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sapc - Re: since we're talking about the media and language/content in reporting on sexual violence - here's my recent letter to one reporter

Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

List archive

Re: since we're talking about the media and language/content in reporting on sexual violence - here's my recent letter to one reporter


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Domitrz <>
  • To: SAPC <>
  • Subject: Re: since we're talking about the media and language/content in reporting on sexual violence - here's my recent letter to one reporter
  • Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:43:52 -0500

Well stated, Wendy.

Your Fan,
Mike Domitrz
http://www.DateSafeProject.org
Direct Line: 414-852-4926

*See the 5 NEW Educational Posters at http://www.DateSafeProject.org

Now you have 17 posters to choose from for making a positive difference on your campus!!

======================


On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:37 AM, 

 wrote:


In your recent story regarding the rape of an underage minor, you characterized the activity as involving "sex", and that the vicitm had a "sexual relationship" with the perpetrator.

"Rape" is a crime - "sex" is not. Rape can never be sex, and vice versa.

I realize you may not want to use harsh language or pass judgment in your story - but that means NOT using erotic terminology - and words of pleasure, as such language conveys non-criminal activity.

I run a first-of-its-kind program at my law school called "The Judicial Language Project", where we use socio-linguistic research to critique the language used in law and society to describe violence against women and children. In connection with this work, I've also trained with the Poynter Institute to train journalists.

The research is compelling that erotic, vague, blaming language and even passive voice - all cause harm to the goal of conveying correctly the violent nature of sexual crimes. This is particularly true for children given their legal incapacity to consent. Your phraseology that the girl "had sex with him" is a classic example of putting the victim in the active role of "having sex". A correct approach would say "the perpetrator raped (or penetrated or sexually abused, etc) the victim" as this puts the offender in the active role and the reader sees him as being the primary responsible party in the harm-doing. Your language has him in the story as a passive recipient of her actions.

Thank you for your time.

Wendy Murphy
New England Law|Boston



Police report Darrin E. Marshall, 43, last known address 66 E. Shields St., forced the 15-year-old girl to have sex with him after she returned from school one day last fall, according to the affidavit for his arrest.

They continued a sexual relationship until May, the affidavit said. She reportedly did not want to have sex with Marshall, a family acquaintance who was visiting, but did not protest and allowed him to "do as he wished," according to the affidavit.

The girl's grandmother contacted Newark police June 5 after the girl told her about the allegations, Newark police Sgt. Scott Snow said.

Marshall denied having sex with the girl in a June interview. He requested an attorney after he was arrested Thursday, so police did not question him further, according to the affidavit.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page