Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: reciprocal no-contact orders
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:15:24 -0500
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
Issuing a no-contact order against both people assumes both are equally
responsible for the violence of one. If a black student accused a white
student of racist violence and asked for a no-contact order against the
offending student, would it make sense to order the victim to stay away from
the offender, too? Is that the policy on any campus? No contact orders are
restraints on freedom with punitive consequences for violations. Why on
earth would such an order be imposed on a student who not only did nothing
wrong but suffered serious harm? Any policy that imposes punisment or
restriction on the victim is wrong and likely violates Title IX.
wendy murphy
New England Law|Boston
- reciprocal no-contact orders, wmurphylaw, 01/16/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.