Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Foubert, John" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: mandatory education in California and through Cleary
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:30:10 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
SAPC Folks,
With all this talk about mandatory education laws in California and other
states that we've had today on our list serve, and with the clarification
that Dan Carter helped us out with that the Cleary act has mandated awareness
on every campus in some form for years, I just would like to wonder out loud
for a minute. Is it just me, or does it sound like there might be the
makings of a class action lawsuit here? I'm no attorney, but it would seem
to me that if institutions are required to be doing some form of education
and are not doing so at all, that particularly effected individuals
(survivors in particular) just might have a case against a university or a
university system for failure to educate a campus population in violation of
the law. One would think there might be an enterprising attorney or firm out
there that might be interested in looking into this.
John
**************************************
John D. Foubert, Ph.D.
Associate Professor; Anderson, Farris, and Halligan Professor
Program Coordinator, College Student Development Master's Degree Program
Oklahoma State University School of Educational Studies
314 Willard Hall
Stillwater, OK 74078
(405) 744-1480
(405) 744-7758 fax
http://okstate.academia.edu/JohnFoubert
http://www.okstate.edu/education/ses/edle/csd/csd.html
- mandatory education in California and through Cleary, Foubert, John, 09/29/2009
- Re: mandatory education in California and through Cleary, S. Daniel Carter, 09/29/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.