Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sapc - Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 1265, Issue 1 - re: marriott case

Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

List archive

Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 1265, Issue 1 - re: marriott case


Chronological Thread 
  • From:
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 1265, Issue 1 - re: marriott case
  • Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:14:25 -0400
  • List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
  • List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>


 


 

For what it's worth

I've handled many similar cases and insurance companies always assert as a 
defense that a mom is contributorily negligent? -

I've sued au pair agencies, for example, for negligent hiring of dangerous 
nannies who then raped or abused the children they cared for - - and the 
insurance company lawyers always claim that the parent was negligent in some 
fashion

women who sue landlords, etc - who claim negligent security allowed the 
offender to get in the home also get sued for their own contributory 
negligence - as do women who sue for intentional tors and are drunk at the 
time - 

i'm not sure why this case was so surprising to people - it's quite common 
insurance defense strategy in my experience

wendy murphy






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page