Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sapc - "Sex Signals"

Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.

List archive

"Sex Signals"


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Ben Atherton-Zeman" <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: "Sex Signals"
  • Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:41:51 -0400
  • List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
  • List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>

Good point, Ethan!

I know that "Sex Signals" (as well as "Voices of Men") requires hosts to have advocates available in the audience, in case this kind of thing happens.

My experience as a performer of educational theatre is that more often, instead of being retraumatized, audience members will realize they have been sexually assaulted for the first time ever. Before seeing the show, maybe they blamed themselves (or others blamed them) and didn't realize it was assault. If an advocate is available to talk to at the end of the show, they'll talk to them and get hooked up with services.

Usually, they'll want to talk to me, but I ask an advocate to stand right next to me so they can end up being the one they talk to. I don't mind listening to someone, but I'm usually gone the next day and the advocate is not.

Until the violence stops, Ben.

Ben Atherton-Zeman, Maynard, MA USA
Actor, Comedian, Feminist and Husband
Presenting a One-Man Play: "Voices of Men," http://www.voicesofmen.org (video clips available)
For booking information, please call 978-897-3619

DEADLINE - JULY 10:
Should we move Domestic Violence Awareness Month from October to either May or September? Take the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=rATVQM4FsDGzLhTnRXhrKg_3d_3d

"As long as some Americans still must struggle, none of us can be fully content."
- President Barack Obama's 4th of July email
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:18:25 -0700
From: "Ethan Young" 
<>
Subject: RE: "Catharsis Productions" and "Sex Signals"
To: 
<>
Message-ID: 
<001101ca00eb$8fa46270$aeed2750$@org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In rereading my post, I feel I need to further clarify my point:

I don't think we should necessarily stop or stifle bystander engagement
initiatives because the potential exists for them to do harm.  Rather, I
think the responsibility is on us to anticipate the potential for harm and
to frame and structure the programming to minimize that potential, as well
as respond appropriately when someone feels re-victimized or triggered.

Programs such as Sex Signals are responsible for their content (inasmuch as
they deliver what they promise), but it is our duty to set the tone and
provide appropriate support for survivors. Even if survivors aren't in the
audience, I believe doing so can send a powerful message of respect for
their experience -- especially when something engaging like Sex Signals can
back it up.

Those are my two cents...

Ethan





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page