Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "Giese, Carrie" <>
- To: <>, <>, <>
- Subject: RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:00:16 -0700
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.virginia.edu/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
I am concerned with saying that any survivors "victims" deserve
criticism...no matter what choices he/she makes about accepting a payoff
or "allowing" high profile cases to falsely characterized as false
claims. Who are we to judge the choices that a survivor makes in the
process of healing. If we do not unconditionally support
survivors....who is going to?
Sincerely,
Carrie Giese
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:46 PM
To:
;
Subject: Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2
it should not go unsaid that when victims take payoffs and allow high
profile cases falsely to be characterized as false claims - the effort
to fight historic and entrenched ideas about women as liars is a much
tougher battle. Such victims deserve criticism.
wendy murphy
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2, wmurphylaw, 04/25/2007
- RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2, Giese, Carrie, 04/25/2007
- RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2, Juliette Grimmett, 04/25/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2, wmurphylaw, 04/25/2007
- RE: SAPC Digest, Vol 727, Issue 2, Giese, Carrie, 04/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.