Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 579, Issue 1
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:42:07 -0400
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.Virginia.EDU/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: "Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus." <sapc.list.mail.virginia.edu>
It's true that schools worry more about the accused student filing a civil
suit than they worry about the victim filing a civil suit - but as my recent
article explains -- this is backward logic because the accused student enjoys
no constitutional rights to due process in a disciplinary hearing while the
victim has a variety of potential constitutional claims via title ix, civil
rights laws, etc -
so if anyone can sue a school for not responding properly or not treating a
student fairly, it is the victim -- not the accused --
the accused is only entitled to that which the school promises in writing --
so it's a kind of contract claim at best -- but even then, the law is so
skeptical of allowing students to sue school for breach of contract the
school is effectively immune as long as they come close to what they promise
-- and because schools usually use fuzzy language -- they easily comply with
their own rules even when they treat similarly situated students very
differently -
the same is not true for schools' treatment of victims because real world
constitutional standards trump schools' policies and rules of procedure, etc.
In short -- from the perspective of avoiding liablity exposure, schools
should be far more worried about how they treat the victim than the accused
-- but most schools have the exact opposite philosophy because they developed
their policies and procedures years ago -- at a time when lawyers for the
accused had a strong presence on campus and were making analogies to the real
world criminal justice system --which is completely improper because
obviously, the school is not the government and there is no liberty at stake
for the accused student - but liberty is at stake for the victim because of
the application of real world civil rights laws to even private school
policies -- the real issue is -- why don't more schools treat violence
against female students as a civil rights matter? That they don't is, in my
opinion, its own civil rights violation -
wendy
- Re: SAPC Digest, Vol 579, Issue 1, WMurphylaw, 08/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.