Subject: Discussion List for campus-based and allied personnel working to end gender-based violence on campus.
List archive
- From: "S. Daniel Carter" <>
- To: "" <>
- Cc: Ilse Knecht <>
- Cc: "Claire N. Kaplan" <>
- Cc: Connie Kirkland <>
- Cc: "Jennifer B. Mercurio" <>
- Subject: Physical Evidence Recovery Kit
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:05:12 -0400
- List-archive: <https://list.mail.Virginia.EDU/mailman/private/sapc>
- List-id: Discussion List for sexual assault educators and counselors on campus. <sapc.list.mail.Virginia.EDU>
Over the years we have gotten conflicting information about exactly what the
guidelines are for the use of a Physical Evidence Recovery Kit when the
victim has not yet decided whether or not to commit to prosecuting. It was
our understanding that the kit was to be offered free, or at least offered,
without this commitment, but of course many agencies continue to insist on a
promise to prosecute before they'll authorize the use of the PERK. This can
remove a key option forever.
We would greatly appreciate any clarification that could be offered on what
the rules are, and if there is any recourse if a hospital or police agency
refuses to use the PERK. Also, are victims afforded the right to pay for the
kit themselves and have it completed even if law enforcement will not
authorize this (or is this a chain of custody issue?)?
Thank you in advance for any help you may be able to offer.
********************************
S. Daniel Carter
Senior Vice President
Security On Campus, Inc.
http://www.securityoncampus.org/
e-mail:
- Physical Evidence Recovery Kit, S. Daniel Carter, 08/26/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Physical Evidence Recovery Kit, S. Daniel Carter, 08/29/2005
- Re: Physical Evidence Recovery Kit, Connie Kirkland, 08/29/2005
- Re: Physical Evidence Recovery Kit, Ilse Knecht, 08/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.